Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Bava Batra 101:2

ולא לאשה בנכסי בעלה וכו': פשיטא כיון דאית לה מזוני מזוני הוא דקא אכלה לא צריכא דיחד לה ארעא אחריתי למזונה

Thereupon R. Kahana and R. Assi said to him: Does our Master retract his ruling? — He replied: You may suppose I refer to such a case<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [Another rendering: 'I merely said that it appears reasonable (cf. n. 1) in such a case etc.'] ');"><sup>3</sup></span> as that mentioned by R. Joseph.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Rab did not actually mention R. Joseph, who was several generations after him, but described a similar case to that given by R. Joseph. ');"><sup>4</sup></span>

Explore commentary for Bava Batra 101:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.

Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse